Keyboard Shortcuts?f

×
  • →Next step
  • ←Previous step
  • ↓Skip this slide
  • ↑Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • nShow notes
  • hShow handout latex source
  • NShow talk notes latex source

Click here and press the right key for the next slide.

(This may not work on mobile or ipad. You can try using chrome or firefox, but even that may fail. Sorry.)

also ...

Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)

Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)

Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)

Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts

 

Moral Foundations Theory Reprise

skipnext section

[nativism] ‘There is a first draft of the moral mind’

[cultural learning] ‘The first draft of the moral mind gets edited during development within a culture’

[intuitionism] ‘Intuitions come first’ --- the Social Intuitionist Model is true

[pluralism] ‘There are many psychological foundations of morality’

(Graham et al., 2019)

Graham et al, 2019

Irrelevant to predictions; no relevant evidence.
Now we are getting somewhere. This was partly supported by Hamlin.

Haidt & Bjorklund, 2008 figure 4.1

puzzle

Why are ethical judgements sometimes, but not always, a consequence of reasoning from known principles?

This is already a good reason to reject the SIM.
Key issue: are unrelfective judgements essentially the result of the foundations? Dual process theory maybe explains why MFQ goes wrong?

[nativism] ‘There is a first draft of the moral mind’

[cultural learning] ‘The first draft of the moral mind gets edited during development within a culture’

[intuitionism] ‘Intuitions come first’ --- the Social Intuitionist Model is true

[pluralism] ‘There are many psychological foundations of morality’

(Graham et al., 2019)

Graham et al, 2019

[nativism] ‘There is a first draft of the moral mind’

[cultural learning] ‘The first draft of the moral mind gets edited during development within a culture’

[intuitionism] ‘Intuitions come first’ --- the Social Intuitionist Model is true

[pluralism] ‘There are many psychological foundations of morality’

(Graham et al., 2019)

Graham et al, 2019

We should hold on to this.
Support for moral pluralism comes from CFA part of MFQ-2; and also, independently of MFT, from the research by Chakroff et al.
Combine these with the dual-process theory. Not futile: can then use other methods to copmlement MFQ, like process dissociation (Luke & Gawronski, 2021). But how to tie them together?
∞todo: check transcript — this is new

How, if at all, does interpreting the results of MFQ-2 depend on the Social Intuitionist Model?

If that model is false, does it alter which conclusions about cultural diversity we should draw?

If that model is false, do we have evidence that moral foundations exist?